Regarding animal topics, there seems to be lack of understanding and some misunderstandings. In this article we will describe some of these misunderstandings and the perceptions necessary to avoid death and animal attacks. The problem seems to be in our misunderstanding that animals are driven by feelings, not pure survival instincts. This will cause us to cause animal attacks to be attributed to anger and revenge human feelings. I know that not everyone has these misunderstandings. What I am talking about is simply that based on evidence, the majority of people are doing. The evidence I reference includes TV shows such as Discovery, Animal Planet, TNT. It also includes news organizations, as well as academia. Again, while some programs are guilty than other programs, the error is in the range from small to absurd.
The main thing the reader needs from this article is that animals are animals driven by the basic instincts necessary to survive. They do not feel anger, jealousy, love, or revenge. Some animals may include the ability for these emotions, but I doubt that their sensations are highly developed or inferred as ours are. So, when we try to make our emotions to the motives of animals, we are making a foolish mistake. All you have to do is look at the situation from the animal's point of view. This is not difficult as we have the ability to infer. As we rubbed the bars and drew them on the walls of the cave, we just try to return to the state of mind that we had never had before.
Main problems:
Tree Hagger has as much responsibility as Hunter. When nature lovers survive cruelly attacked by animals, they usually make a statement. "I did not understand what it was doing." It is not true. The animal knew exactly what it was doing. They will also argue that they should not be put into such a situation. That sentence is actually true to a certain extent. When we jump into nature, we will not be attacked by wild animals. What we have to expect is that there is a possibility, and we must accept responsibility for this if we enter into the forest anyway.
Animals are finding their natural land which is threatened by housing development, business, and other activities that bring humans to where the animals were walking. Their territory is shrinking. So when we go into the forest it is our responsibility. If for some reason someone enters the forest and is attacked by animals, why nothing. It is their fault. why? Because they know behind their heart that it is a possibility. If you enter the forest with your child and they are attacked, that is because of their parents. why? Because they knew that it was a possibility. You have all the rights to take risks, but when something bad happens, you can not blame the animal.
People believe that animals are not important. Only humanity is important in this world. When an animal is attacked by a car, shot, or killed by means other than natural means. So what. This is a very ignorant perspective to have for one reason. We live in a world dominated by balance. If one thing affects the other, and one species disappears, it will affect other species. Sometimes it can be a good way for that species, and sometimes it can be a bad way. If all predatory birds are extinct than it would be large for rodents. Whatever the rodent eats, it will not be that good, and it will not be good for us either. Certain things may be extinct without significantly compromising the balance of things. A major problem occurs when multiple extinctions occur. These individuals who are not respected by animals are usually angry quickly when attacked by animals. That animal has attacked me, so I have to die! They even doubt that they even consider the possibility that they will bear any responsibility for entering the woods during the day. What matters is that when people enter the woods, we must be aware of the danger. This is true for any natural environment we enter consciously and we know enough that we may be attacked by bears and sharks.
I will never forget the episode of the world's wonderful video, or perhaps it was the most extreme that the elephant was running around in the streets of Mexico. If my memory is right, this elephant is acting at the circus, turning on the trainer (killing) and starting running down the street. This elephant has been murdered in the street. I had no problem with it, it was obvious that the animal had to be knocked down. It was a statement by the wicked commentator of the show that I had a problem. "This is a tragic event, but please do not forget why this is necessary," he said. It may not be a single word, but that is clear. It was a monster wielded rage, so the elephant had to die! Is it ignorance? In my opinion, it was a very ignorant statement I shouted loudly on my television. It is a fact that the elephant killed the trainer. It is also a fact that the elephant has runaway. Why are these the only valid points? Have you ever thought that an elephant could not have been there before in the first place? Elephants do not belong to the circus and do not belong to the zoo. The only aim that a zoo should fulfill is to rehabilitate injured animals or to protect animals in danger of extinction.
Animals are wild, the only mistake made in the situation of elephants is that we thought that we could tame or control this animal. Can you do it? Yes, you can, but you can. Personally, if an animal in a zoo or circus attacks a person, I do not want to hear about it. I can not find compassion with me. The important thing is that animals belong to the wild. I do not mind how tame we are and whether we are tame. In fact there is always the possibility of attacking for reasons not involved. I have enough time to try to understand why people do some of what they do. The last thing I have to do on a daily basis is to figure out what elephants, bears or sharks were thinking.
When I was young, I went to the zoo. I was 21 when I last visited the zoo. It was in the Busch Gardens and the Disney's Wild Kingdom. I am 31 years old, I have never been to the zoo ever since. Just because I do not believe in them I never go to the zoo again. It is ridiculous to take wildlife and put it in the cage for our entertainment. How many of us want to be stuck in the fence, but I do not mind how naturally it is comfortable. There is not much, but we are not talking about people, so it is not a problem. Animals do not belong to the cage. They are meant to go out into the field. Therefore, if you place an animal in a situation that does not belong instinctively, you can not assume the responsibility for that action. We are the only ones who can be responsible for animal attacks that arise at zoos and circuses. Not only the owner of zoos and circus, but also people who got attacked. After all, they are people paying for entering the place where dangerous animals are bred. In all of its responsibilities and in too many cases, we do not want to accept our responsibility sharing in this day and the times.
Animals are not ruled by the same things as us. When people misunderstand us, we get mad. If people love us, we love going back. Humans can have a series of emotions including jealousy, happiness, sadness, anger, fear etc. We can also plan and plan. If someone makes us very angry or jealous, we may wish to harm others. Animals do not think like this and whenever they hear or read animal attacks. I always hear someone trying to return a human motive to the reason the animal behaved like it did. Real life is not lady and cards, or hedge over. Animals do not infer as we do. The only activities involving animals are eating, sleeping, pooing, peeing, breeding. From the day they were born until the day they die, they are only interested in the process of life.
Our lifestyle, together with our highly developed brains, allows us to move beyond these simple processes. They are still there and will continue to be the focus of life forever, but they never consume as much of our lives as it does for animals. Humans still need eating, sleeping, shitting, pissing, breeding and so on. We work for food and recreation. We got water from a well and live in a house or an apartment. This allows us to apply our energy to other places. Animals are not given this. Mainly because they have not evolved to the extent human beings have. This is exactly the case, no one's fault. Our evolution will change our responsibility. Since we know our actions, we must recognize that we are responsible for our actions. Unlike animals, they are not conscious of their behavior.
Even if I walk through the forest and Grizzly Bear attack me, I will not do so from anger. Grizzly may just look at me as a simple target. If it is hungry it then searches for food. It is wrong to say that humans are not part of what they eat. If you are hungry, bears eat anything. We know that bears eat meat. Indeed, bears are known to eat everything from fruit to buck. Since we rarely come into contact with bears, we say things like "They do not usually eat people", "We are not part of their diet". Since our evolution, we have put ourselves in a limited environment called a residence. In the countryside, residents can catch a glimpse of the appearance of bears in the backyard, but there is no bear here. The important thing is that we are meat. Yes, human beings are meat. we are. You slice us, slice it and eat us in a frying pan. You can not be hungry. We are full of plenty of protein and fat, it is amazing to survive long winter. We do not regard food as food. We tend to refuse cannibalism. We eat chicken, beef, pork, rum, duck, lobster, crab etc. There is little on our planet that we do not eat.
Rather than humans eating bears, do not you like being bears to eat people? The main reason was to imagine whether it was eaten or not, I think it concluded that it would suck. It does not matter whether it sucks or not. The important thing is that you can eat it like any other animal on this planet. It is irrational to say that a bear is thirsty or tastes blood. From that time they are children of bears. They like blood and eat a lot. They mean "human taste" like "human taste" like it. This is a good example. If you have never tasted Chinese food so far, you can try it and you will find that you like it. I would like to eat Chinese food as much as possible. In reality, I love Chinese food, and I eat it every day if possible. The same can be said about bears. How can I know my preferences? We do not eat each other. Human meat may be the most unusual flavor meat on earth. Given that the active activities of our society are low, I think it is very soft.
So, if a bear attacks me, then he gets a taste. It may only be that he likes it. It is natural for a bear to find that delicious meat a little more. That is why the bear is not thirsty. That means he likes it by tasting humans and is still looking for it. Humans set good targets. Looking at us, we do not have finger nails, long and sharp teeth. Because we are not big, we lost the ability to protect ourselves without using clubs, knives and guns. The only thing we do in that situation is our higher intellect. We can not kill bears with bare hands, so we are forced to try it with dead play. By the way, we are not the only people that adopt this strategy.
Another very important part of the Grizzly Bear attack puzzle is human expansion. We are constantly expanding into new areas where these animals once lived. How can we see how they see this activity? As I said before, I doubt that they will present reasonable human thoughts against the situation, but they acknowledge the change. Some animals may be able to associate humans with this change threatening their home. This can cause an attack by natural instinct. This could kill animals for killing. It is not from anger or jealousy. Animals only know we are responsible for the change. They are threatened and attack. This is almost the same as a young male lion seeking to manage pride in older lions. During the season like a raccoon dollar fixes the corner for the right to mate. These are instinctive behaviors that may be caused by invasion into the realm of human animals. Then, the animal regards us as a threat, and in the animal world only two threatening things are done. You turn it off or kill. This behavior may explain some of the attacks of animals that have developed in this country and worldwide.
Of course, it depends on the animal you are talking about. Bears, deer, big cats may behave like this, but sharks and crocodiles rarely do. In the case of many shark attacks, it is either a fake identity or not. It can not be said certainly about Crocs, but I think most attacks are about a handful of foods about the territory.
A conclusion
The important thing is that many of the attacks of animals in this country are simply sunny meals problems. Man wanders in the environment where animals live, they simply consider us as simple targets. Animals considers us as food. How often do you think before we cut into steaks and eat hamburgers. This is almost the same way as predators will see us in their environment. They do not regard us as people. They think we are a juicy steak ... for discussion. Before we advance into places where we can contact these animals, we need to remember this. Even if you do not consider some of these animals as dangerous, you still have to be cautious. Please listen to someone who has been attacked by a deer. Many of us do not think deer will pose a threat, but they can do damage. After all, we can not truly understand why animals attacked us. The fact that animals can attack and do is unchanged. Sometimes we live and sometimes we die. If we choose to enter the woods, we will accept this result to a great extent. Even when moving to new housing development, we need to keep this in mind. It will take time for animals to let go of old territory and look for new territory. Unfortunately, they are not always possible, and this makes increasing contact between humans and animals. It is just an illusion as much as we think that we control the earth. If we are not careful in the future it is an illusion that we can truly sacrifice us.
I do not say that even if a bear kills a person or a child it should not be killed. Personally, I think that it depends on the situation of attack and family wishes. After all, regardless of whether animals are placed or not, I guarantee you will not have the feeling that animals are right or wrong. When animals like bears eat people, they probably try to eat more than the food. We must have a good taste for them, or the statement that "It got the taste for the blood" would not have survived as long as it was. So what do you do with such animals? The only thing we can do is not to give people the opportunity to like meat. We need to be more aware of how the world works beyond the boundaries of our city and town. Another world we left long ago is called wild. Knowledge is power. We need to know the possibility of attack when entering the forest. Even though we live in rural areas we must always be aware that the possibility still remains. We should find out what measures can be taken in order to become accustomed to the threatening animals in this area and to ensure safety.
As far as the zoo is concerned, we should take full responsibility there. When an animal kept eating one of us, then, how are you! It is our fault that animals are in such a situation in the first place. Elephants belong to Africa, Polar bears belong to Kitakami, Lions belong to Africa, and so on. We can not expect them to suppress millions of years of natural instinct just because they want to train them to entertain us. It's just ridiculous. The same can be said of other forms of entertainment that use circus and wild animals. Even if you are well trained, they can still attack us for some reason. In short, unless you place animals in a position to attack animals, you will not get attacked. If I had left the African Mexican elephant to which it belongs rather than the trainer, today I will still be alive, I wish in a different occupation.
Even the most domesticated animals on earth are still unpredictable. A dog can point towards the owner with a heartbeat. It may have never been done before, and may never do that again. Still, that is not the fault of the animal. It is because of the person with the animal. I had more than my share of my fare for my cat and dog during my lifetime, and I had some scratches to prove it. As far as I am concerned, it is in the territory. If you think that I do not mind keeping pets, you should be pleased with enduring the results of that animal's behavior.
No comments:
Post a Comment